home | e-letter | personnel/patrons/board | contact iona | donations | the iona blog | news | feeds | press
Relevant Links

The Iona Blog

Opinions contained in The Iona Blog are not necessarily those of The Iona Institute. The Iona Blog is open to anyone who broadly shares the views of The Iona Institute. If you wish to post a comment on a relevant topic please email 200 – 400 words to [email protected] and it will be considered for inclusion in the blog.

Religion and politics in same boat [David Quinn]

The '23rd Report on British Social Attitudes' came out a fortnight ago. It reports, among many other things, a decline in membership of political parties and trades unions.

View full text

Mixed race families and gay adoption [David Quinn]

Here is something new. White couples from Europe and elsewhere are travelling to India to be impregnated via fertility clinics with the embryos of Indian women.

View full text

Individualisation: Fine Gael hedging its bets? [David Quinn]

To its great credit, the Labour party has unambiguously declared that the current system of tax individualisation discriminates against single-income married couples in favour of dual-income married couples. According to Labour's Joan Burton, this can be to the tune of €5,260 per year.

Of course, if it has a rational basis, discrimination can be justified. The rationale for individualisation was that it was needed in order to provide an incentive for women to get out into the workplace. It was not pro-choice however. It denigrated the choice of staying at home to look after a child, an elderly relative, a disabled person etc.

Whatever economic justification there was for tax individualisation when it was introduced several years ago when employers were crying out for more women in the workplace, no longer exists because there is now a plentiful supply of workers from countries such as Poland etc. This means the basis, such as it was, for discriminating in favour of dual-income couples has all but collapsed.

Fine Gael also accepts that individualisation badly affects stay-at-home parents, but unlike Labour it appears to be hedging its bets. It is worried that by coming out against individualisation the party might alienate double-income families.

But would it? Surely the sensible thing to do wouldn't be to reverse individualisation per se, but to give single-income married couples the same tax benefits as dual-income married couples. Who would that alienate?

In any case, shouldn't Fine Gael also be worried about alienating all those single-income couples, all 75,000 of them?


Archbishop hits the mark on marriage [Tom O'Gorman]

It is all too rare to see a respected public figure put forward the case for marriage in a cogent, comprehensive and unapologetic fashion. That's why it was refreshing to read yesterday's speech by Archbishop Rowan Williams on the subject.

View full text

Iona Institute Poll Summarised [Tony Allwright]

As we know, the Iona Institute kicked itself off last month with a poll regarding family arrangements which sought, from a cross-section of 950 people across Ireland, their agreement/disagreement with seven statements (ref).

View full text

Gay Adoption in the UK [Tony Allwright]

Britain's' Equality Act of 2006 is a piece of legislation pushed into being under EU pressure. Its laudable aim is to outlaw discrimination towards people on grounds of - listed in this order - age, disability, gender, sex-change, race, religion, belief or sexual orientation. (The order is interesting. Is there an implied hierarchy that values my aged transgenderism over your one-legged voodoo?).

View full text

Fukayama and State-funded schools [David Quinn]

Francis Fukayama made his name with the book 'The End of History'. This postulated that the age-old struggle to find the best way of ordering our political life together had ended with the defeat of communism and the victory of liberal democracy.

View full text

Affluenza or secularism? [David Quinn]

The psychologist Oliver James, who made his name with 'Britain on the Couch', has a new book out called 'Affluenza'. It's not his term, it been around for a few years, but basically it amounts to an extreme bout of consumerism, the idea that we are what we own, that we are fulfilled by what we own, and that we can't be happy unless we're keeping up, and passing out, the Joneses.

View full text

Do children need a mother and father? [David Quinn]

The fierce debate taking place in England over whether or not Church adoption agencies should be forced to consider homosexual couples as prospective parents rages around three issues, namely the principle of non-discrimination, religious freedom and the rights of children.

View full text

Church unity on gay adoption welcome [Tom O'Gorman]

The news that Anglican leaders in the UK have lent their voices to Catholic opposition to New Labour's plan to force religious adoption agencies to consider homosexual couples for adoption is welcome. Quite apart from the political significance of the statement from Archbishop Rowan Williams and Archbishop John Sentamu backing Cardinal Cormac Murphy O'Connor, it is of profound significance from an ecumenical point of view.

View full text

Our commentators' blind spot [David Quinn]

The importance of religious freedom is one of the themes of the Iona Institute. Religious freedom belongs roughly in same the category as freedom of conscience, that is, it is part of the freedom to act in accordance with your beliefs. In a liberal society, of course, that means doing so in a way that doesn't do harm to others. (Although we can argue all day about what exactly constitutes harms to others.)

View full text

Government sharp practice on referendum? [Tom O'Gorman]

According to reports (see news), the Government is planning to lump together a series of proposals concerning children's rights in their proposed referendum in March or April. Reports suggest that the proposed wording may impact upon three seperate articles of the Constitution.

View full text

Politically incorrect remarks not always political folly [Tom O'Gorman]

Drink driving is on the agenda again. This time, however, the story appears to have taken something of a surreal twist. Rural politicians, always on the look out for a way to shore up a few more votes, seem to have zeroed in on the issue.

View full text

Cohabitation and marriage [David Quinn]

A new study says that when the State creates civil partnerships (so-called 'marriage-lite') marriage rates are not affected. (Read more). The fear of some individuals has been that by making civil partnerships an alternative to marriage, the number of people getting married would drop as a direct result. According to this study at any rate, this has not happened.

View full text

Questions on the family [Tom Carew]

I write as a citizen increasingly concerned with multiple social breakdown in Irish and other Western Societies, and with the frequent absence of rational ethical or social policy debate in the media, along with the substitution of emotion and "compassion" for reasons, reasoning, comparative research, and hard evidence.

View full text

What makes us happy [Tom O'Gorman]

A new report commissioned by the British Government sets out to discover what makes us happy. (See news). It turns out that having time to spend with other people is one of the big drivers of human happiness. Hardly a surprise.

View full text

Attention Pat Rabbitte [David Quinn]

If he hasn't already seen it, here's something that might interest Pat Rabbitte. In Australia the new leader of the Labor party, Kevin Rudd, is trying to re-orientate the industrial relations debate. Instead of focusing in purely on issues like pay and conditions, Rudd is trying to highlight the effect of work practices on our relationships. (Read more).

View full text

Introducing ‘plural marriage’ [David Quinn]

To you and me it’s called polygamy but the new and more polite name for it is ‘plural marriage’ and in America the move is on to have it legalised.

View full text

Referendum on children still poses uncomfortable questions [Tom O'Gorman]

Yesterday's Irish Times front page story appeared to be good news for the many people concerned about Government proposals to change the definition of the family to give rights to children. But certain questions remain.

View full text

Guardian poll on religion [David Quinn]

The headline in the Guardian over Christmas read: “Religion does more harm than good”. The sub-head read: “82pc say faith causes tension in country where two thirds are not religious”.

View full text

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16


© 2007 IONA Institute | | All Rights Reserved | | Charity No: 17347


Institute for Marriage and Public Policy

First Things

Relationships Foundation

National Fatherhood Initiative

The Institute for the Study of Civil Society


Family Facts

Family & Life

The Christian Institute



"If I were asked to design a system for making sure that children's basic needs were met, we would probably come up with something quite similar to the two-parent ideal...The fact that both parents have a biological connection to the child would increase the likelihood that the parents would identify with the child and be willing to sacrifice for that child, and it would reduce the likelihood that either parent would abuse the child.."

Sara McLanahan and Gary Sandefur, "Growing up with a single parent: What hurts, what helps."